Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Southern Medical University ; (12): 1753-1759, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-880804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the effects of intervention with oral probiotic @*METHODS@#This study were conducted among 155 women in the third trimester of pregnancy with positive results of GBS culture in the Outpatient Department of Zhujiang Hospital from March to November, 2019. After excluding 32 patients who received lactobacillus intervention for less than 2 weeks or underwent postpartum GBS retesting, the women were divided into oral probiotics intervention group (60 cases) and non-intervention group (63 cases). According to the results of GBS retesting, the 60 women in the intervention group were divided into GBS-negative group (18 cases) and persistent GBS-positive group (42 cases). At the end of the intervention, the rates of negative GBS culture result were calculated and the pregnancy outcomes were compared. From 5 women randomly selected from the intervention group, samples of vaginal secretions were collected before and after the intervention for amplicon sequencing and bioinformatics analysis.@*RESULTS@#At the end of the intervention, the GBS-negative rate in the intervention group was 30% (18/60), as compared with 23% (3/13) in the non-intervention group. Probiotic intervention significantly reduced the incidence of premature rupture of membranes (@*CONCLUSIONS@#Intervention with oral probiotics can reduce vaginal GBS colonization in late pregnancy and improve the pregnancy outcome.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Limosilactobacillus reuteri , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus , Microbiota , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Streptococcus agalactiae , Vagina
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL